From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pouncy v. Palmer

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 31, 2024
13-cv-14695 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2024)

Opinion

13-cv-14695

07-31-2024

OMAR RASHAD POUNCY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN D. PALMER, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY REMAINDER OF STATE COURT SENTENCE PENDING APPEAL (ECF No. 500)

MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner Omar Rashad Pouncy has filed a motion to stay the remainder of his state court sentence pending appeal. The motion is DENIED. It is not clear to the Court that it has the authority to grant the requested relief in light of the fact that appeals by both parties are pending in the Sixth Circuit. But even if the Court had such authority, it would not exercise that authority to grant a stay because the Court is not persuaded that Pouncy is entitled to that relief or that granting that relief would otherwise be appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pouncy v. Palmer

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 31, 2024
13-cv-14695 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Pouncy v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:OMAR RASHAD POUNCY, Petitioner, v. CARMEN D. PALMER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 31, 2024

Citations

13-cv-14695 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 31, 2024)