From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pouncil v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1169-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1169-CMK-P.

February 10, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, this case was not assigned to a District Judge when the case was filed. The parties have not consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction and, in order to properly address the pending motion to dismiss, the court will direct the random assignment of a District Judge at this time. The court will address the motion to dismiss by separate findings and recommendations.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a District Judge to this case and to update the docket to reflect the new case number.


Summaries of

Pouncil v. Tilton

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-09-1169-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Pouncil v. Tilton

Case Details

Full title:MADERO POUNCIL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1169-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)