From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poulson v. Pentland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Jun 14, 2016
CV 16-27-H-DLC-JTJ (D. Mont. Jun. 14, 2016)

Opinion

CV 16-27-H-DLC-JTJ

06-14-2016

KERMIT POULSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID PENTLAND, et. al., Respondents.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Order, Findings and Recommendations in this matter on May 17, 2016, recommending dismissal of Petitioner Kermit Poulson's ("Poulson") writ for a petition of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Poulson failed to timely object to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived his right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted).

Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's conclusion that Poulson's petition should be dismissed because: (1) the Court lacks jurisdiction over Poulson's claims because his petition fails to allege that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); and (2) Poulson has failed to show that he has exhausted all available state judicial remedies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254(b)(1)(A).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 3) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

(2) Poulson's petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and failure to exhaust state judicial remedies.

(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal.

(4) A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Dated this 14th day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Poulson v. Pentland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION
Jun 14, 2016
CV 16-27-H-DLC-JTJ (D. Mont. Jun. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Poulson v. Pentland

Case Details

Full title:KERMIT POULSON, Petitioner, v. DAVID PENTLAND, et. al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

Date published: Jun 14, 2016

Citations

CV 16-27-H-DLC-JTJ (D. Mont. Jun. 14, 2016)