From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poullard v. Howard

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 1, 2021
Civil Action H-20-454 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action H-20-454

11-01-2021

RODNEY POULLARD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CASEY HOWARD, et al, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of Judge Sam S. Sheldon signed on October 6, 2021, and made a de novo determination. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989). Based on the pleadings, the record, and the applicable law, the court adopts the Memorandum and Recommendation as this court's Memorandum and Order. This court finds and concludes that Judge Sheldon's decision denying Rodney Poullard, Jr.'s motion to reopen case is amply supported by substantial evidence in the record and that Judge Sheldon properly applied the legal standards. Poullard's Motion to Reopen Case, Docket Entry No. 17, is denied.


Summaries of

Poullard v. Howard

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Nov 1, 2021
Civil Action H-20-454 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Poullard v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY POULLARD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CASEY HOWARD, et al, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Nov 1, 2021

Citations

Civil Action H-20-454 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 1, 2021)