From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pough v. Hixon

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 1, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00035-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:07-cv-00035-MCE-EFB P.

May 1, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has filed a request for reconsideration of this court's order filed August 30, 2007, affirming the order of the magistrate judge filed July 17, 2007. In his request, petitioner states that he did not receive his legal mail. The court notes that petitioner filed two documents [see docket #s 6 and 7] after the court filed the order dismissing his petition with leave to amend. Petitioner filed notice of a change of address on March 6, 2007, two months prior to the filing of the recommendation of dismissal for failure to amend. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate any new or different facts or circumstances which did not exist or were not shown upon the prior motion. See E.D. Local Rule 78-230(k).

Accordingly, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED.


Summaries of

Pough v. Hixon

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 1, 2008
No. 2:07-cv-00035-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2008)
Case details for

Pough v. Hixon

Case Details

Full title:DANA POUGH, Petitioner, v. BRIAN HIXON, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 1, 2008

Citations

No. 2:07-cv-00035-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 1, 2008)