From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pough v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 12, 2014
No. 64973 (Nev. May. 12, 2014)

Opinion

No. 64973

05-12-2014

JERRY D. POUGH, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to dismiss criminal charges. Petitioner contends that his speedy trial rights were violated, the State withheld evidence, and the district court should have allowed him to represent himself without questioning his competency or appointing standby counsel. Without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised in the documents submitted in this matter, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. Petitioner has an adequate remedy at law, as he may challenge his conviction on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

__________, J.

Hardesty

__________, J.
Douglas
__________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon, Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge

Jerry D. Pough

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Pough v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 12, 2014
No. 64973 (Nev. May. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Pough v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Case Details

Full title:JERRY D. POUGH, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 12, 2014

Citations

No. 64973 (Nev. May. 12, 2014)