From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potts v. Webb

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jul 6, 2021
6:21-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 6, 2021)

Opinion

6:21-cv-00184

07-06-2021

James Edward Potts, Plaintiff, v. Warden G. Webb et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge John D. Love pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3). The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that this lawsuit be dismissed pursuant to the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report.

When no party objects to a magistrate judge's report, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Here, being satisfied that the report contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. This lawsuit is dismissed with prejudice as to the filing of another in forma pauperis lawsuit presenting the same claims, but without prejudice as to the refilling of this lawsuit upon payment of the full filing fee. The plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Potts v. Webb

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Jul 6, 2021
6:21-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Potts v. Webb

Case Details

Full title:James Edward Potts, Plaintiff, v. Warden G. Webb et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Jul 6, 2021

Citations

6:21-cv-00184 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 6, 2021)