From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potts v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 5, 2007
919 A.2d 562 (Del. 2007)

Summary

assuming without deciding that even if § 452 establishes a viable defense to assault where two parties "intended to fight . . . one-on-one," it had no applicability where the victim was "blind-sided . . . attacked with a deadly weapon"

Summary of this case from Schaffer v. State

Opinion

No. 334, 2006.

March 5, 2007.

Appeal from the Superior 0408019252.


Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Potts v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Mar 5, 2007
919 A.2d 562 (Del. 2007)

assuming without deciding that even if § 452 establishes a viable defense to assault where two parties "intended to fight . . . one-on-one," it had no applicability where the victim was "blind-sided . . . attacked with a deadly weapon"

Summary of this case from Schaffer v. State
Case details for

Potts v. State

Case Details

Full title:Potts v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Mar 5, 2007

Citations

919 A.2d 562 (Del. 2007)

Citing Cases

Schaffer v. State

We find no error in the Family Court's determination that Schaffer was delinquent of conspiracy beyond a…