From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potts v. Motor Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1926
131 S.E. 739 (N.C. 1926)

Opinion

(Filed 3 March, 1926.)

APPEAL by defendant from Bond, J., and a jury, at October Term, 1925, of CRAVEN. No error.

D. L. Ward for plaintiff.

Moore Dunn for defendant.


Civil action to recover damages. The issues submitted to the jury and their answers thereto, were as follows:

"1. Was the Apperson car destroyed by fire after defendant had received possession of it under the contract sued on? Answer: Yes.

"2. Was said fire caused by the negligence of said Cobb Motor Company? Answer: Yes.

"3. What damage is plaintiff entitled to recover from defendant? Answer: $356.00."

There was a judgment rendered on the verdict. Defendant excepted and assigned error. In the record there are six assignments of error made by defendant.


We have examined the six assignments of error with care and can find no error in law. The jury has found the facts for plaintiff.

In the judgment there is

No error.


Summaries of

Potts v. Motor Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1926
131 S.E. 739 (N.C. 1926)
Case details for

Potts v. Motor Co.

Case Details

Full title:FRED L. POTTS v. CARTER-COBB MOTOR COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1926

Citations

131 S.E. 739 (N.C. 1926)
131 S.E. 739

Citing Cases

Redfoot v. J.T. Jenkins Co.

esumption has been held in numerous cases to apply in favor of an automobile owner whose vehicle has been…

Prettyman v. Hopkins Motor Co.

hy, 44 Idaho 320, 256 P. 760; Lederer v. Railway Terminal and Warehouse Company, 346 Ill. 140, 178 N.E. 394,…