From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potts v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Richmond
Oct 23, 2001
553 S.E.2d 560 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Record No. 2854-99-1. Circuit Court No. CR99-1700.

October 23, 2001.

Theresa B. Berry (Berry, Ermlich, Lomax Bennett, on brief), for appellant.

H. Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General (Randolph A. Beales, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Before Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton, Elder, Bray, Annunziata, Bumgardner, Frank, Clements and Agee.


UPON A REHEARING EN BANC.

By opinion dated May 22, 2001, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Potts v. Commonwealth, 35 Va. App. 485, 546 S.E.2d 229 (2001). We granted rehearing en banc and stayed the mandate of that decision.

Upon rehearing en banc, the stay of this Court's May 22, 2001 mandate is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the majority panel decision.

Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton, Elder and Clements dissent for those reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of the panel. See id. at 497-505, 546 S.E.2d at 235-39.

ORDER

It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant an additional fee of $200 for services rendered the appellant on the rehearing portion of this appeal, in addition to counsel's costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses. This amount shall be added to the costs due the Commonwealth in the May 22, 2001 mandate.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.


Summaries of

Potts v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia. Richmond
Oct 23, 2001
553 S.E.2d 560 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Potts v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN MICHAEL POTTS, APPELLANT, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Virginia. Richmond

Date published: Oct 23, 2001

Citations

553 S.E.2d 560 (Va. Ct. App. 2001)
553 S.E.2d 560

Citing Cases

White v. Commonwealth

"`Where a juvenile is involved, "[t]his includes evaluation of the juvenile's age, experience, education,…

Rodriguez v. Commonwealth

Determining whether a waiver was knowing and intelligent, "[w]here a juvenile is involved, `. . . includes…