From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potter v. Kaiser Company

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 10, 1949
171 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 11889.

January 10, 1949.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Claude McColloch, Judge.

Green, Landye Peterson and James T. Landye, both of Portland, Or., for appellants.

Gordon Johnson and J. Warren Manuel, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Richard Devers, of Portland, Or. (Thelen, Marrin, Johnson Bridges, of San Francisco, Cal., and Hart, Spencer, McCulloch Rockwood, of Portland, Or., of counsel), for appellee Kaiser Co.

Tom C. Clark, Atty. Gen. of United States, H.G. Morison, Asst. Atty. Gen., Henry L. Hess, U.S. Atty., of Portland, Or., Enoch E. Ellison, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Johanna M. D'Amico, Atty., Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D.C., for appellee United States.

Before MATHEWS, BONE, and ORR, Circuit Judges.


The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B.H. Hubbert Son, 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 993, certiorari denied Cingrigani v. B.H. Hubbert Son, 69 S. Ct. 138; Battaglia v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 254, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 236; Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 262, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 166; Fisch v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir., 169 F.2d 266, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 405.


Summaries of

Potter v. Kaiser Company

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 10, 1949
171 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Potter v. Kaiser Company

Case Details

Full title:C.T. POTTER et al., Appellants, v. KAISER COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 10, 1949

Citations

171 F.2d 705 (9th Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Moss v. Hawaiian Dredging Co.

177 F.2d 529; Battaglia v. General Motors Corp., 2 cir., 169 F.2d 254, certiorari denied 335 U.S. 887, 69…