From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potter v. Brinker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 4, 1989
540 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-313.

April 4, 1989.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction — Mandamus.

Gary Philip Potter, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michele L. Crawford, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and COPE, JJ.


Defendant seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to rule on his motion to vacate pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Although, pursuant to our request, defendant furnished this court with a copy of the certified mail, return receipts indicating that his motion was received by the office of the clerk on November 9, 1988, respondent has been unable to locate the motion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus without prejudice to defendant refiling an appropriate motion upon which the trial court should take prompt action.


Summaries of

Potter v. Brinker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 4, 1989
540 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Potter v. Brinker

Case Details

Full title:GARY PHILIP POTTER, PETITIONER, v. HONORABLE RICHARD P. BRINKER, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 4, 1989

Citations

540 So. 2d 265 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)