From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Potier v. Potier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1993
198 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 30, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff's relocation to New Hope where her new husband could be within commuting distance of his work in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, does not violate the parties' separation agreement. New Hope is within 60 radial miles, although 77 road miles, of the Empire State Building. Moreover, although defendant's midweek visitation has necessarily been diminished, the court has increased his visitation in other respects.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Potier v. Potier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1993
198 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Potier v. Potier

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE POTIER, Also Known as MICHELE MOOBERRY, Respondent, v. GERARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 77

Citing Cases

Matter of Wright v. Wright

Accordingly, we find that the custody and visitation arrangement in the parties' separation agreement,…

Hapeman v. Hapeman

In addition, defendant should be afforded six weeks of visitation during the children's summer vacation and a…