Potee v. Co. Com. A.A. Co.

McCarty v. City of Baltimore
265 Md. 423 (Md. 1972) Cited 5 times
Con. Law - Due Process
We agree in both respects. Potee v. County Comm'rs of Anne Arundel County, 138 Md. 381 (1921). Judge Harris found that McCarty had "failed to sustain his burden of proof."
Brack v. Wells
184 Md. 86 (Md. 1944) Cited 77 times
Con. Law - Due Process
Upholding the refusal of the trial court to issue a writ of mandamus to the State's Attorney ordering him to prosecute a case
In an application for mandamus all the facts necessary for the writ must be stated and proved or admitted on the record. Sudler v. Lankford, 82 Md. 142, 148, 33 A. 455; McCurdy v. Jessop, 126 Md. 318, 324, 95 A. 37; Potee v. County Commissioners of Anne Arundel County, 138 Md. 381, 113 A. 884. The writ of mandamus is not granted ex debito justitiae.