From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poston v. Dixie Ohio Exp. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 28, 1949
177 F.2d 301 (5th Cir. 1949)

Opinion

No. 12894.

October 28, 1949.

Frank M. Gleason, Rossville, Ga., Silver S. Squarcia, Miami, Fla., for appellants.

A. Walton Nall, Atlanta, Ga., Dean Owens, Rome, Ga., for appellees.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.


When this case was here before it was on the appeal of Dixie Ohio Express Company and American Fidelity and Casualty Company. After the going down of our mandate, in which we ordered a new trial, appellants here, plaintiffs in the court below, "moved the court to enter an order for a new trial in accordance with the mandate". The district judge ordered a new trial as to Dixie Ohio Express Company and American Fidelity and Casualty Co., the appellants on the former appeal, and denied it as to defendants Revels and Killian, who had not been parties to that appeal. Appealing from that order, plaintiffs, appellants here, urge its reversal upon us as not in accordance with the mandate.

Dixie Ohio Express Co. et al. v. Poston et al., 5 Cir., 170 F.2d 446.

It is quite plain that the attacked order was not a final order and was not appealable. The appeal should, therefore, be, and it is hereby,

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Poston v. Dixie Ohio Exp. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 28, 1949
177 F.2d 301 (5th Cir. 1949)
Case details for

Poston v. Dixie Ohio Exp. Co.

Case Details

Full title:POSTON et al. v. DIXIE OHIO EXP. CO. et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 1949

Citations

177 F.2d 301 (5th Cir. 1949)

Citing Cases

Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales

It is likewise well settled that no appeal will lie from an order overruling a motion for a new trial.…