From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Post v. Post

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1988
141 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 6, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zelman, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is removed from the Trial Calendar.

On November 10, 1986, a hearing which had been directed by order dated October 14, 1986, was to have taken place before the hearing Justice in connection with a motion which the defendant wife had made in a separate action (see, Post v Post, 141 A.D.2d 518 [decided herewith]). Instead of conducting that hearing, the hearing Justice, in the absence of any motion pending in the instant case, vacated 5 previous orders of 4 different Justices, all of which had refused to allow the plaintiff husband to proceed to trial in the present case because of his noncompliance with previous discovery demands, and ordered the parties to proceed to trial. Such action constituted a deviation from the principles which comprise the doctrine of law of the case (see also, Post v Post, supra) and we order a reversal. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Post v. Post

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1988
141 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Post v. Post

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH POST, Respondent, v. BETTY POST, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 517 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Post v. Post

In May 1986, the plaintiff Betty Post made a motion requesting, among other things, an order modifying the…

Kimmel v. State

Defendants promptly opposed plaintiffs' discovery notice, arguing, among other grounds, that it sought…