From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Positive Techs. Inc. v. Sony Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI

10-26-2011

POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, GATEWAY, INC., DELL, INC., ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, MSI COMPUTER CORPORATION, AMAZON.COM, INC., BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AND KOBO INC., Defendants, and CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD., Intervenor.

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Perry R. Clark LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK J. Scott Denko (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 00792457) Bradley D. Coburn (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 24036377) Steven J. Lauff (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 24013011) DENKO COBURN & LAUFF LLP R. James George, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 07810000) GEORGE & BROTHERS LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SONY ELECTRONICS, INC. Kevin P.B. Johnson Jim Glass QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ACER AMERICA CORPORATION Kevin Jones Qudus Olaniran FREITAS, TSENG, BAIK & KAUFMAN LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT GATEWAY, INC. Kevin Jones Qudus Olaniran FREITAS, TSENG, BAIK & KAUFMAN LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT DELL, INC. Thomas M. Dunham (pro hac vice) J. Michael Woods (pro hac vice) NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL Karen I. Boyd Joshua M. Masur Steven W. Flanders TURNER BOYD LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MSI COMPUTER CORPORATION William James Brown , Jr Janet S. Park BROWN WEGNER BERLINER ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT AMAZON.COM, INC. Stephen J. Joncus John D. Vandenberg Philip Warrick KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP Edward C. Duckers Craig A. Carnes, jr. STOEL RIVES LLP ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT BARNES & NOBLE, INC. Krista Marie Carter Christopher Hu DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT KOBO INC. Robert Thomas Haslam , III COVINGTON & BURLING LLP Bhanu K Sadasivan COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR CHUNGWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD. James M. Godner Russ Emerson Steven M. Levitan HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP


Perry R. Clark (California Bar No. 197101)

LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK

J. Scott Denko (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar

No. 00792457)

Bradley D. Coburn (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas

State Bar No. 24036377)

Steven J. Lauff (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State

Bar No. 24013011)

DENKO COBURN & LAUFF LLP

Counsel for Plaintiff

POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Thomas M. Dunham (pro hac vice)

J. Michael Woods (pro hac vice)

NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP

Stephanie R. Wood (State Bar No. 242572)

NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

DELL INC.

ADDITIONAL COUNSEL LISTED ON

SIGNATURE PAGE

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

FOR SERVICE OF DEFENDANTS'

INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND

ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendants Sony Electronics, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Gateway, Inc., Dell Inc., ASUS Computer International, MSI Computer Corporation, Amazon.com, Inc., Barnes & Noble, Inc., Kobo Inc., and Intervenor Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. (cumulatively "Defendants") and Plaintiff Positive Technologies Inc. ("PTI") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the date for Defendants to serve their Invalidity Contentions and document production accompanying their Invalidity Contentions pursuant to N.D. California Patent Local Rules 3-3 and 3-4 by two business days from the Court ordered deadline of October 24, 2011 [Dkt. No. 209 entered September 9, 2011] to October 26, 2011.

PTI timely served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims Infringement Contentions by U.S. Mail. Service by U.S. Mail resulted in varying dates of receipt by Defendants. In light of the differing dates of receipt, Plaintiff offered to extend the date for Defendants to serve their Invalidity Contentions and document production accompanying their Invalidity Contentions by two business days.

This is the first extension to the Court's Scheduling Order Dkt. No. 209 sought by the parties. This extension will have no effect upon any of the other deadlines or the case schedule.

Respectfully Submitted,

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF POSITIVE

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Perry R. Clark

LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK

J. Scott Denko (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 00792457)

Bradley D. Coburn (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 24036377)

Steven J. Lauff (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 24013011)

DENKO COBURN & LAUFF LLP

R. James George, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 07810000)

GEORGE & BROTHERS LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SONY

ELECTRONICS, INC.

Kevin P.B. Johnson

Jim Glass

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &

SULLIVAN

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ACER

AMERICA CORPORATION

Kevin Jones

Qudus Olaniran

FREITAS, TSENG, BAIK & KAUFMAN LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

GATEWAY, INC.

Kevin Jones

Qudus Olaniran

FREITAS, TSENG, BAIK & KAUFMAN LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT DELL,

INC.

Thomas M. Dunham (pro hac vice)

J. Michael Woods (pro hac vice)

NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ASUS

COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL

Karen I. Boyd

Joshua M. Masur

Steven W. Flanders

TURNER BOYD LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT MSI

COMPUTER CORPORATION

William James Brown , Jr

Janet S. Park

BROWN WEGNER BERLINER

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

AMAZON.COM, INC.

Stephen J. Joncus

John D. Vandenberg

Philip Warrick

KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP

Edward C. Duckers

Craig A. Carnes, jr.

STOEL RIVES LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT BARNES

& NOBLE, INC.

Krista Marie Carter

Christopher Hu

DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT KOBO

INC.

Robert Thomas Haslam , III

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

Bhanu K Sadasivan

COVINGTON AND BURLING LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENOR

CHUNGWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD.

James M. Godner

Russ Emerson

Steven M. Levitan

HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

CERTIFICATION BY STEPHANIE WOOD PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE. NO. 45,

SECTION X, RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and an associate in the law firm of Novak Druce + Quigg LLP, counsel for defendant Dell Inc. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto. 2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 24th day of October 2011, at San Francisco, California.

Stephanie R. Wood (State Bar No. 242572)


Summaries of

Positive Techs. Inc. v. Sony Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 26, 2011
Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)
Case details for

Positive Techs. Inc. v. Sony Elecs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., ACER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011)