From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Positive Techs. Inc. v. Sony Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 25, 2011
Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI

10-25-2011

POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, GATEWAY, INC., DELL, INC., ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, , MSI COMPUTER CORPORATION, AMAZON.COM, INC., BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AND KOBO INC., Defendants, and CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES, LTD., Intervenor.

Perry R. Clark (California Bar No. 197101) LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK J. Scott Denko (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 00792457) Bradley D. Coburn (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 24036377) Steven J. Lauff (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar No. 24013011) DENKO COBURN & LAUFF LLP Counsel for Plaintiff POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) Anna M. Ison (Bar No. 254173) Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP David Nelson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP Chicago, IL James M. Glass Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP New York, NY Attorneys for Defendant SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.


Perry R. Clark (California Bar No. 197101)

LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK

J. Scott Denko (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State Bar

No. 00792457)

Bradley D. Coburn (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State

Bar No. 24036377)

Steven J. Lauff (Pro Hac Vice) (Texas State

Bar No. 24013011)

DENKO COBURN & LAUFF LLP

Counsel for Plaintiff

POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)

Anna M. Ison (Bar No. 254173)

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

David Nelson

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Chicago, IL

James M. Glass

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

New York, NY

Attorneys for Defendant

SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE

FOR SERVICE OF SONY'S INVALIDITY

CONTENTIONS AND ACCOMPANYING

DOCUMENTS

AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendant Sony Electronics, Inc. ("Sony") and Plaintiff Positive Technologies Inc. ("PTI") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the date for Sony to serve its Invalidity Contentions and document production accompanying their Invalidity Contentions pursuant to N.D. California Patent Local Rules 3-3 and 3-4 by four business days from the Court ordered deadline of October 24, 2011 [Dkt. No. 209 entered September 9, 2011] to October 28, 2011.

PTI timely served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims Infringement Contentions by U.S. Mail. Service by U.S. Mail resulted in varying dates of receipt by Defendants. In light of the differing dates of receipt, Plaintiff offered to extend the date for Sony to serve its Invalidity Contentions and document production accompanying their Invalidity Contentions by four business days, provided that Sony's service is made by FedEx for Monday October 31, 2011 10:00 am delivery.

This extension will have no effect upon any of the other deadlines or the case schedule.

Respectfully Submitted,

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF POSITIVE

TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Perry R. Clark

LAW OFFICES OF PERRY R. CLARK

J. Scott Denko (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 00792457)

Bradley D. Coburn (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 24036377)

Steven J. Lauff (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 24013011)

DENKO COBURN & LAUFF LLP

R. James George, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice)

(Texas State Bar No. 07810000)

GEORGE & BROTHERS LLP

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT SONY

ELECTRONICS, INC.

Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)

Anna M. Ison (Bar No. 254173)

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

David Nelson

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

James M. Glass

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

New York, NY
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

CERTIFICATION BY ANNA M. ISON PURSUANT TO GENERAL RULE. NO. 45,

SECTION X, RE E-FILING ON BEHALF OF MULTIPLE SIGNATORIES

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of California, and an associate

in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, counsel for defendant Sony Electronics, Inc. The statements herein are made on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness I could and would testify thereto.

2. The above e-filed document contains multiple signatures. I declare that concurrence has been obtained from each of the other signatories to file this jointly prepared document with the Court. Pursuant to General Rule No. 45, I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered, or for inspection upon request by a party until one year after final resolution of the action (including appeal, if any).

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 25th day of October, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.

________________

Anna M. Ison


Summaries of

Positive Techs. Inc. v. Sony Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 25, 2011
Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Positive Techs. Inc. v. Sony Elecs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:POSITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., ACER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 11-CV-2226 SI (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)