From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Posey v. Lasalle Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 31, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-0767-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Oct. 31, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-0767-JWD-EWD

10-31-2018

HENRY POSEY (#97166) v. LASALLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER


NOTICE

Please take notice that the attached Magistrate Judge's Report has been filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), you have fourteen (14) days after being served with the attached Report to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations therein. Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations within 14 days after being served will bar you, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge which have been accepted by the District Court.

ABSOLUTELY NO EXTENSION OF TIME SHALL BE GRANTED TO FILE WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 31, 2018.

/s/ _________

ERIN WILDER-DOOMES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pro se Plaintiff, a prisoner previously confined at the LaSalle Correctional Center ("LCC"), Olla, Louisiana, filed this proceeding pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against LCC, complaining that his constitutional rights were violated when moneys were improperly withdrawn from his inmate account at the facility shortly before he was transferred to another institution.

Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) and (2), a civil action may generally be brought in a judicial district in which any defendant resides or in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. Further, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), a case filed in a Court of improper or inconvenient venue may be transferred, in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the parties and witnesses, to a district in which it could have been brought. In the instant case, Plaintiff is currently confined in the Western District of Louisiana and complains regarding events that allegedly occurred in the Western District. Inasmuch as Plaintiff and the named Defendant and witnesses related to Plaintiff's claim are located in the Western District, the Court believes that it is in the interest of justice to transfer this case to the Western District of Louisiana where the evidence and witnesses will more likely be easily located and produced.

RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that this matter be transferred to the Western District of Louisiana for further proceedings.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on October 31, 2018.

/s/ _________

ERIN WILDER-DOOMES

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Posey v. Lasalle Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Oct 31, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-0767-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Oct. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Posey v. Lasalle Corr. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY POSEY (#97166) v. LASALLE CORRECTIONAL CENTER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 18-0767-JWD-EWD (M.D. La. Oct. 31, 2018)