From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porto v. City of Laguna Beach

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Southern Division
May 21, 2013
Sacv 12-00501-Doc (Pla) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2013)

Opinion


LEONARD J. PORTO, III, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, et al., Defendants. No. Sacv 12-00501-Doc (Pla) United States District Court, C.D. California, Southern Division. May 21, 2013

          ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has reviewed the amended complaint, the motion to dismiss, and all of the records and files herein, and has conducted a de novo review of that portion of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge to which objections were filed. The Court accepts and adopts the findings and recommendations in the Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED:

         1. All federal claims against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice but for the claim against the City of Laguna Beach and John Pieteg, in his official capacity, challenging the durational residency requirement for utilizing the Alternative Sleeping Location ("ASL").

         2. The state law claim brought under the California Public Records Act is DISMISSED without prejudice.


Summaries of

Porto v. City of Laguna Beach

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Southern Division
May 21, 2013
Sacv 12-00501-Doc (Pla) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Porto v. City of Laguna Beach

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD J. PORTO, III, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Southern Division

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

Sacv 12-00501-Doc (Pla) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2013)