From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portland Cmty. Coll. v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 24, 2023
3:21-cv-01658-AR (D. Or. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-01658-AR

02-24-2023

PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and DENIS MCDONOUGH, in his capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Defendants.


ORDER

HERNANDEZ, DISTRICT JUDGE:

Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Armistead issued a Findings and Recommendation on January 24, 2023, in which he recommends that the Court deny Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim. F&R, ECF 38. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988)(de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Armistead's Findings and Recommendation, ECF 38. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Portland Cmty. Coll. v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 24, 2023
3:21-cv-01658-AR (D. Or. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Portland Cmty. Coll. v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs

Case Details

Full title:PORTLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-01658-AR (D. Or. Feb. 24, 2023)