From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 13, 2007
214 S.W.3d 349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. ED 87395.

February 13, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Louis County, John A. Ross.

Jo Ann Rotermund, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.



Tony Portis ("Movant") appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion. Movant was charged, plead guilty, and convicted as a persistent offender, of two counts of leaving the scene of an accident and one count of second-degree assault. Movant failed to appear for sentencing and a warrant was issued. Movant was later apprehended and sentenced to twenty-two years in prison.

Because of Movant's failure to appear at his sentencing hearing, we dismiss the appeal based on the escape rule. The escape rule is a judicially created doctrine that serves to deny the right of appeal or post-conviction relief to a defendant who escapes justice. Nichols v. State, 131 S.W.3d 863, 865 (Mo.App.E.D.2004). Willful failure to appear for sentencing invokes the escape rule. State v. Crump, 128 S.W.3d 642, 643 (Mo.App.E.D.2004).

The appeal is dismissed.

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Portis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Feb 13, 2007
214 S.W.3d 349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Portis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Tony PORTIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

214 S.W.3d 349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

State v. Shields

A defendant's failure to appear at sentencing constitutes an "escape" for purposes of the rule. State v.…

State v. Kelsall

State v. Marsh , 248 S.W.3d 648, 650 (Mo. App. 2008). As is the case here, this court is authorized to…