From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portis v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 2, 2012
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-846 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-846

03-02-2012

PRESTON PORTIS, JR., Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants.


HON. ROBERT J. JONKER


ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action (docket # 133). The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties on February 3 and 6, 2012. No objections have been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, filed February 3, 2012 (docket # 133), is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant R.N. Bates's uncontested motion to set aside the default (docket # 116) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the uncontested motions for summary judgment by defendants Richard Czech (docket # 120) and R.N. Bates (docket # 127) are GRANTED, and Defendants Richard Czech and R.N. Bates are DISMISSED from this action.

It is further ordered that Defendant Iqbal's uncontested motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment (docket # 130) is GRANTED, and Defendant Iqbal is DISMISSED from this action.

_________

ROBERT J. JONKER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Portis v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 2, 2012
CASE NO. 1:09-CV-846 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Portis v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON PORTIS, JR., Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 2, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:09-CV-846 (W.D. Mich. Mar. 2, 2012)