From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portillo v. 137 East 110th Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 3, 2006
25 A.D.3d 328 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

7461.

January 3, 2006.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered April 6, 2005, denying the motion of defendant 137 East 110th Street, LLC, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Harrington, Ocko Monk, LLP, White Plains (I. Paul Howansky of counsel), for appellant.

DiJoseph Portegello, PC, New York (Arnold E. DiJoseph, III, and Norman I. Lida of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ., concur.


Triable issues of fact exist as to whether appellant retained control over the cellar doors on its premises and, if so, whether it had constructive notice of the tripping hazard allegedly presented by those doors.


Summaries of

Portillo v. 137 East 110th Street

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 3, 2006
25 A.D.3d 328 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Portillo v. 137 East 110th Street

Case Details

Full title:MARIA PORTILLO, Respondent, v. 137 EAST 110TH STREET, LLC, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 3, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 328 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 24
805 N.Y.S.2d 831