From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portfolio Recovery Assocs. v. Lall

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Oct 15, 2013
41 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2013)

Summary

In Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Lall, 41 Misc.3d 128(A) (2013), the court held that a “notice of assignment” and an “Affidavit of Sale of Individual Account” along with other evidence were sufficient to establish the standing of the plaintiff that it was the assignee of the debt when it commenced its consumer credit action.

Summary of this case from In re Pinpoint Techs., LLC

Opinion

No. 507278/13.

2013-10-15

PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Richard LALL, Defendant–Appellant.


THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


Summaries of

Portfolio Recovery Assocs. v. Lall

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Oct 15, 2013
41 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2013)

In Portfolio Recovery Associates v. Lall, 41 Misc.3d 128(A) (2013), the court held that a “notice of assignment” and an “Affidavit of Sale of Individual Account” along with other evidence were sufficient to establish the standing of the plaintiff that it was the assignee of the debt when it commenced its consumer credit action.

Summary of this case from In re Pinpoint Techs., LLC
Case details for

Portfolio Recovery Assocs. v. Lall

Case Details

Full title:PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Richard LALL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 15, 2013

Citations

41 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 51682
980 N.Y.S.2d 278

Citing Cases

In re Pinpoint Techs., LLC

Giving a liberal interpretation to both the definition of instrument and the notice of assignment, it would…