From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Mar 25, 2022
No. 5D22-198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2022)

Opinion

5D22-198

03-25-2022

CHARLES M. PORTER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Charles M. Porter, Milton, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Petition Alleging Ineffectiveness of Appellate Counsel, LT Case No. 2018-CF-5470-A-OA Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Charles M. Porter, Milton, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of postconviction appellate counsel is dismissed. See Gilbert v. State, 315 So.3d 791, 791 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) ("As Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d) does not provide a vehicle to challenge postconviction appellate counsel's effectiveness, the petition is dismissed.").

PETITION DISMISSED.

EVANDER, WALLIS and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Porter v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District
Mar 25, 2022
No. 5D22-198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Porter v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES M. PORTER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fifth District

Date published: Mar 25, 2022

Citations

No. 5D22-198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 25, 2022)