From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Spann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2016
CAUSE NO. 1:16CV15-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Mar. 22, 2016)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:16CV15-LG-RHW

03-22-2016

PHILLIP ANTHONY PORTER PLAINTIFF v. FRANK SPANN DEFENDANT


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

BEFORE THE COURT is the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [4] filed by the defendant Frank Spann. The plaintiff Phillip Anthony Porter has not filed a response in opposition to the Motion. After reviewing the Motion, the record in this matter, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the Motion to Dismiss should be granted.

DISCUSSION

Porter alleges that his adjacent neighbor Spann committed a trespass by "cutting timber, removing vegetation, and altering the physical and topographical makeup of Plaintiff's property," which is located in Greene County, Mississippi. (Compl. at 2, ECF No. 1). Porter also alleges that Spann's actions constituted negligence. (Id. at 3). In his Complaint, Porter alleges that he is a citizen of Alabama and that Spann is a citizen of Mississippi. (Id. at 1). However, Spann has filed the present Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, asserting that diversity of citizenship is lacking because Spann is actually a resident of Alabama. Porter has not filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss or otherwise disputed that Spann is actually a resident of Alabama.

28 U.S.C. § 1332 confers federal diversity jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and the civil action is between citizens of different states. Since the parties do not currently dispute that Spann and Porter are both residents of Alabama, diversity jurisdiction does not exist, and this lawsuit must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [4] filed by the defendant Frank Spann is GRANTED. This lawsuit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 22nd day of March, 2016.

/s/_________

LOUIS GUIROLA, JR.

CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Porter v. Spann

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 22, 2016
CAUSE NO. 1:16CV15-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Mar. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Porter v. Spann

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP ANTHONY PORTER PLAINTIFF v. FRANK SPANN DEFENDANT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:16CV15-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Mar. 22, 2016)