From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Porter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 3, 1997
698 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2592

Opinion filed September 3, 1997

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Ronald Dresnick, Judge.

Cain Snihur, and May L. Cain, for appellant.

Jodi Ayn Mumford Porter, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Roberta G. Mandel, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee, State of Florida.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.


Craig Michael Porter appeals an order of commitment pursuant to an adjudication of indirect criminal contempt. As the state properly concedes, the trial court erred in failing to comply with the procedures set forth in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. See De Mauro v. State, 632 So.2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse the finding of criminal contempt and order of commitment and remand for a new hearing. The matter shall be heard before a different judge as Porter's motion to recuse the judge was legally sufficient to establish the he had a well-grounded fear that he would not receive a fair hearing. See Fischer v. Knuck, 497 So.2d 240 (Fla. 1986); Wargo v. Wargo, 669 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Porter v. Porter

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 3, 1997
698 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Porter v. Porter

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG MICHAEL PORTER, APPELLANT, vs. JODI AYN MUMFORD PORTER AND THE STATE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 3, 1997

Citations

698 So. 2d 643 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Lo v. Lo

At the same time, while acknowledging and commending the not inconsiderable investment that the trial judge…