From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Penn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 9, 2011
1:07-CV-0825 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)

Opinion

1:07-CV-0825 AWI SMS Document #122

09-09-2011

RONALD L. PORTER, Plaintiff, v. B.J. PENN, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On November 15, 2010, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. On December 13, 2010, during a status conference with Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder, Defendant withdrew his motion for summary judgment. See Document #127. However, an administrative review of the docket in this action reveals that the November 15, 2010 motion has been termed as an outstanding motion.

Accordingly, Defendant's motion is DENIED as withdrawn and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to term this motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Porter v. Penn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 9, 2011
1:07-CV-0825 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Porter v. Penn

Case Details

Full title:RONALD L. PORTER, Plaintiff, v. B.J. PENN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 9, 2011

Citations

1:07-CV-0825 AWI SMS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2011)