From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Ives

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 7, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1195 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1195 KJM P.

December 7, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On July 15, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction.

On September 7, 2010, the court ordered petitioner to file an opposition to the motion within twenty-one days. Petitioner was warned that failure to file an opposition would result in dismissal of this action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner has not filed his opposition. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED: December 6, 2010.


Summaries of

Porter v. Ives

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 7, 2010
No. CIV S-10-1195 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Porter v. Ives

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN A. PORTER, Petitioner, v. RICHARD IVES, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 7, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1195 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)