From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Hill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 30, 2009
Civil No. 07-605-CL (D. Or. Apr. 30, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 07-605-CL.

April 30, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff Mark Porter, an inmate at Snake River Correctional Institution, brings this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various prison officials. Porter complains that prison employees have improperly opened several letters to him marked "legal mail." Prison officials admit that happened on at least one occasion, but state it was inadvertent.

On March 3, 2009, Magistrate Judge Clarke filed his Report and Recommendation (R R), which recommends granting Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Porter objected to the R R. The matter is now before me for de novo review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

An isolated instance in which a prison employee inadvertently opens an inmate's "legal mail," then realizes the error and takes appropriate measures to minimize any resulting harm, is not actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. State officials can be held accountable if they know of an ongoing problem with inmate legal mail improperly being opened, yet fail to take appropriate measures to correct that situation, or if state officials choose to remain ignorant of a problem.

The limited record submitted to this court by the pro se plaintiff is insufficient to demonstrate a pervasive problem that state prison officials have chosen to ignore. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that summary judgment should be granted for the defendants in this action.

Conclusion

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (docket # 51) are adopted. Defendants' motion (# 38) for summary judgment is granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Porter v. Hill

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 30, 2009
Civil No. 07-605-CL (D. Or. Apr. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Porter v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:MARK DEWAYNE PORTER, Plaintiff, v. JEAN HILL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 30, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 07-605-CL (D. Or. Apr. 30, 2009)

Citing Cases

Bostwick v. State of Oregon

Defendants cite cases for the proposition that a single mistake infringing on Bostwick's right to free…

Bostwick v. Oregon

Defendants cite cases for the proposition that a single mistake infringing on Bostwick's right to free…