From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 24, 2002
298 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

90372

Decided and Entered: October 24, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Hemmett Jr., J.), entered December 12, 2000 in Washington County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Larry Porter, Auburn, appellant pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting assault on staff stemming from his conduct of kicking a correction officer while being removed from his cell. Petitioner's subsequent review pursuant to CPLR article 78 was dismissed by Supreme Court, prompting this appeal. Notwithstanding petitioner's assertion to the contrary, a review of the record establishes that petitioner received all the documents to which he was entitled. Although the Hearing Officer denied petitioner's request for various documents, the record reveals that petitioner failed to establish why the documents would be relevant to the pending charge (see Matter of Dabney v. Murphy, 278 A.D.2d 714).

Next, we reject petitioner's contention of Hearing Officer bias. Despite the fact that petitioner was restrained during the hearing for safety reasons and that he was later excluded from the final portion of the hearing due to his disruptive conduct, the record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner (see Matter of Webb v. Goord, 269 A.D.2d 641). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they are preserved for our review, have been found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Porter v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 24, 2002
298 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Porter v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LARRY PORTER, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 24, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 531

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Green v. Goord

Turning to the merits, we are unpersuaded by petitioner's challenge to the second misbehavior report.…

Ferguson v. Fischer

To the extent that petitioner contends that the pen was not contraband and, therefore, not a violation of 7…