Porter v. Cochran

1 Citing case

  1. Gibbs v. Cochran

    142 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1962)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that the jurisdiction of the parole commission is not disturbed when the infraction giving rise to revocation was committed during the parole period, but actual revocation occurred after the period had run

    But we have since remanded prisoners to custody when it appeared that they had waived the right to a hearing before more than one commissioner on the question of revocation of parole. Porter v. Cochran, Fla., 123 So.2d 465, Sumrall v. Cochran, Fla., 127 So.2d 447. In the instant case the petitioner alleged that he was heard before only one commissioner, however, the record submitted by the Attorney General shows that the petitioner signed an agreement that the hearing on the charge of parole violation proceed before one member of the Commission. So on this score he cannot prevail.