From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 13, 2006
Case No. 1:05-CV-562 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 13, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05-CV-562.

November 13, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff N. Kalonji Owusu I, also known as Nathaniel Porter, has filed his Objections to United States Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody's Order of September 20, 2006, which stayed discovery in this matter. This Court reviews the Order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) to determine whether it is "clearly erroneous or contrary to law."

Upon such review, the Court determines that Defendants' request to stay discovery was properly granted. A pending summary judgment motion by Defendants has asserted the defense of qualified immunity. Given such, binding precedent entitled Defendants to the stay of discovery until qualified immunity is determined. See Siegert v. Gilley, 500 U.S. 226, 231 (19991); Christophel v. Kukulinsky, 61 F.3d 479, 484 (6th Cir. 1995). Plaintiff's allegation that qualified immunity was asserted in bad faith is not supported by the record. The determination of the Magistrate Judge was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objection (Dkt. No. 98) is DENIED and the Order of September 20, 2006 is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Porter v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 13, 2006
Case No. 1:05-CV-562 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Porter v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL PORTER, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 13, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05-CV-562 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 13, 2006)