From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Baxter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
Case No.: 5:10-cv-206-RS-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 5:10-cv-206-RS-GRJ

03-05-2013

DWIGHT J. PORTER, Plaintiff, v. COLONEL BAXTER ,et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner at Calhoun Correctional Institution, filed a third amended complaint against six defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 25.) The Court dismissed the claims against three defendants, Doc. 57, but the Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Lee, Dudley, and Baxter remain pending. On February 11, 2013, the Court directed Defendants to submit a status report stating whether any additional discovery was required prior to trial, in light of the fact that no motion for summary judgment had been filed. (Doc. 66.) The Court directed Defendants to advise the Court if no additional discovery was required, so that the matter could be set for trial. Defendants have submitted the required status report, and state that they do not require any additional discovery.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk is directed to refer this matter to District Judge Richard Smoak for scheduling of trial in accordance with the Court's schedule.

________________________

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Porter v. Baxter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
Case No.: 5:10-cv-206-RS-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Porter v. Baxter

Case Details

Full title:DWIGHT J. PORTER, Plaintiff, v. COLONEL BAXTER ,et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 5:10-cv-206-RS-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 5, 2013)