From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Porter v. Augustine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Apr 22, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00316-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00316-MP-EMT

04-22-2013

CHARLES E PORTER, Petitioner, v. PAGE AUGUSTINE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents.


ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated February 11, 2013. (Doc. 21). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 8) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction based upon Petitioner's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit.

_______________

Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Porter v. Augustine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION
Apr 22, 2013
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00316-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2013)
Case details for

Porter v. Augustine

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E PORTER, Petitioner, v. PAGE AUGUSTINE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION

Date published: Apr 22, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-00316-MP-EMT (N.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2013)