From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portee v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 15, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-13928 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 15, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-13928

09-15-2016

ANDRE JAVION PORTEE Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment. (ECF No. 5.) On October 13, 2015, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for submission of proposed findings and recommendations ("PF&R"). (ECF No. 4.) Magistrate Judge Tinsley filed an amended PF&R on July 14, 2016, recommending that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion. (ECF No. 9.)

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and a party's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Objections to the PF&R in this case were due on August 1, 2016. To date, no objections have been filed.

As detailed in the PF&R, Plaintiff's seeks review of a final agency decision rendered by a division of the United States Department of Agriculture, but his original complaint does not include a complete copy of that decision. In response, Plaintiff filed, on July 20, 2016, a copy of the complete agency decision in question. (ECF No. 10.) As this additional filing does not challenge Magistrate Judge Tinsley's analysis with respect to Plaintiff's entitlement to default judgment, the Court does not construe it as an objection to the PF&R. --------

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF&R, (ECF No. 9), and DENIES Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, (ECF No. 5).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: September 15, 2016

/s/_________

THOMAS E. JOHNSTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Portee v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Sep 15, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-13928 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 15, 2016)
Case details for

Portee v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE JAVION PORTEE Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 15, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-13928 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 15, 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Jones

This screening is generally conducted prior to ruling upon the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis…

Strasburg v. Hardy Cnty.

This screening is generally conducted prior to ruling upon the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis…