From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portcullis Computer Sec. Ltd. v. Portcullis Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 4, 2011
Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS)

11-04-2011

PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD., a United Kingdom Corporation, PORTCULLIS INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. PORTCULLIS SYSTEMS INC., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendant.

JAIME J. SANTOS THE CRONE LAW GROUP By: Jaime J. Santos Attorneys for Plaintiffs Portcullis Computer Security Limited and Portcullis Inc. WILLIAM E. HILTON GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP By: William E. Hilton Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis Systems Inc.


Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109)

Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344)

THE CRONE LAW GROUP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO

PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO VENUE AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT

The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, have entered into a stipulation (the "Stipulation") on the terms that follow and request that the Court enter an order embracing the terms of the Stipulation.

1. The parties are currently involved in settlement discussions, which may provide resolution of this matter, and have agreed that Defendant may have an extension of time up to and including December 2, 2011 to answer, or otherwise respond, to the First Amended Complaint.

2. Three previous time modifications have been implemented by request of the parties. On July 20, 2011, Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted an unopposed motion for an extension of time to meet the deadlines set forth in the Court's April 25, 2011 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines ("Case Management Order"), and to reset the Case Management Conference. On July 21, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiffs' unopposed motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order. On July 29, 2011 Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted a proposed stipulation to continue the date for filing responsive pleadings. On August 1, 2011, the Court signed the order granting the stipulated continuance. On October 3, 2011 Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted a proposed stipulation to continue date for filing responsive pleadings. On October 4, 2011, the Court signed the order granting the stipulated continuance.

I hereby attest that I have on file at The Crone Law Group a copy of any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

JAIME J. SANTOS

THE CRONE LAW GROUP

By: Jaime J. Santos

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Portcullis Computer Security Limited and

Portcullis Inc.

WILLIAM E. HILTON

GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP

By: William E. Hilton

Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis

Systems Inc.

ORDER

Based on to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the terms of the Stipulation shall become the order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Judge Joseph C. Spero


Summaries of

Portcullis Computer Sec. Ltd. v. Portcullis Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 4, 2011
Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Portcullis Computer Sec. Ltd. v. Portcullis Sys. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD., a United Kingdom Corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)