From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Portcullis Computer Sec. Ltd. v. Portcullis Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS)

10-04-2011

PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD., a United Kingdom Corporation, PORTCULLIS INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. PORTCULLIS SYSTEMS INC., a Massachusetts Corporation, Defendant.

Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109) Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344) THE CRONE LAW GROUP Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAIME J. SANTOS THE CRONE LAW GROUP Jaime J. Santos Attorneys for Plaintiffs Portcullis Computer Security Limited and Portcullis Inc. WILLIAM E. HILTON GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP William E. Hilton Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis Systems Inc.


Michael J. Coffino (SBN 88109)

Jaime J. Santos (SBN 276344)

THE CRONE LAW GROUP

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

CONTINUE DATE FOR FILING

RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO

PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT AND STIPULATION TO

VENUE AND PERSONAL

JURISDICTION IN THIS COURT

The parties to this action, through their respective counsel, have entered into a stipulation (the "Stipulation") on the terms that follow and request that the Court enter an order embracing the terms of the Stipulation.

1. To facilitate settlement discussions and a potential resolution of this matter, the parties have agreed that Defendant may have an extension of time up to and including November 2, 2011 to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

2. Two previous time modifications have been implemented by request of the parties. On July 20, 2011, Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted an unopposed motion for an extension of time to meet the deadlines set forth in the Court's April 25, 2011 Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines ("Case Management Order"), and to reset the Case Management Conference. On July 21, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiffs' unopposed motion to extend the deadlines set forth in the Case Management Order. On July 29, 2011 Plaintiffs, Portcullis Computer Security Ltd. and Portcullis Inc., submitted a proposed stipulation to continue date for filing responsive pleadings. On August 1, 2011, the Court signed the order granting the stipulated continuance.

I hereby attest that I have on file at The Crone Law Group a copy of any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

JAIME J. SANTOS

THE CRONE LAW GROUP

Jaime J. Santos

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Portcullis Computer Security Limited and

Portcullis Inc.

WILLIAM E. HILTON

GESMER UPDEGROVE LLP

William E. Hilton

Attorneys for Defendant Portcullis

Systems Inc.

ORDER

Based on to the Stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the terms of the Stipulation shall become the order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Portcullis Computer Sec. Ltd. v. Portcullis Sys. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 4, 2011
Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Portcullis Computer Sec. Ltd. v. Portcullis Sys. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PORTCULLIS COMPUTER SECURITY LTD., a United Kingdom Corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 4, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV-11-2023 (JCS) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2011)