From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Port of Portland v. Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C"

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 30, 2020
No. 3:18-cv-00411-JR (Leading Case) (D. Or. Dec. 30, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-00411-JR (Leading Case) No. 3:18-cv-00412-JR (Trailing Case)

12-30-2020

PORT OF PORTLAND, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. "C", and KINDER MORGAN BULK TERMINALS, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Russo issued Findings and Recommendations on August 20, 2020, in which she recommends that this Court deny Third-Party Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF 65 in 3:18-cv-00411-JR ("Leading Case"); ECF 80 in 3:18-cv-00412-JR ("Trailing Case")) and grant Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF 129 in Leading Case; ECF 146 in Trailing Case) on Third-Party Plaintiff's claims alleging breach of contract and contractual indemnity. F&Rs, ECF 175 (Leading Case), ECF 192 (Trailing Case). The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Third-Party Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendations. Third-Party Pl.'s Objs., ECF 186 (Leading Case), ECF 204 (Trailing Case). When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

The Court has carefully considered Third-Party Plaintiff's objections and concludes that there is no basis to modify the Findings & Recommendations. The Court has also reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and finds no error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings & Recommendations.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendations [175][192]. Therefore, Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [129][146] are GRANTED and Third-Party Plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment [65][80] are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 30, 2020.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Port of Portland v. Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C"

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Dec 30, 2020
No. 3:18-cv-00411-JR (Leading Case) (D. Or. Dec. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Port of Portland v. Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "C"

Case Details

Full title:PORT OF PORTLAND, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Dec 30, 2020

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-00411-JR (Leading Case) (D. Or. Dec. 30, 2020)

Citing Cases

Cabading v. Port of Portland

In Port of Portland v. Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. , Magistrate Judge Russo resolved motions for summary…