Opinion
November, 1926.
Order denying defendant's motion for a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kelly, P.J., Manning and Young, JJ., concur; Jaycox and Kapper, JJ., dissent.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Popkin v. Vierengel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Summaries of
Popkin v. Vierengel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for
Popkin v. Vierengel
Case Details
Full title:FLORENCE POPKIN, Respondent, v. MATTHEW VIERENGEL, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1926
Citations
218 App. Div. 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)