From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pope v. Sprayberry

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Dec 19, 2024
4:22-cv-35-CDL-AGH (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-cv-35-CDL-AGH

12-19-2024

FRANKIE WAYNE POPE, Petitioner, v. Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, Respondent.


ORDER

CLAY D. LAND U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

After a de novo review of the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge on December 3, 2024 is hereby approved, adopted, and made the Order of the Court.

The Court considered Petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation and finds that they lack merit.

Petitioner on December 17, 2024, filed a motion that he styled as an amendment to his prior amended Rule 60(b) motion (ECF No. 125). The Court construed that most recent filing as an objection to the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 19th day of December, 2024.


Summaries of

Pope v. Sprayberry

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Dec 19, 2024
4:22-cv-35-CDL-AGH (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Pope v. Sprayberry

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE WAYNE POPE, Petitioner, v. Warden KEVIN SPRAYBERRY, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Dec 19, 2024

Citations

4:22-cv-35-CDL-AGH (M.D. Ga. Dec. 19, 2024)