From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pope v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Jun 23, 1989
548 So. 2d 37 (La. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. W89-572.

June 23, 1989.

APPEAL FROM 9TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE ROBERT P. JACKSON, J.

Juneau, Judice, Patrick A. Juneau, Lafayette, for defendant/applicant.

Fuhrer, Flournoy, George A. Flournoy, Alexandria, for plaintiff/respondent.

Roy Hattan, Lee Ishee, Lafayette, Johnson McAlpine, Richard A. Cozad, New Orleans, for defendants/respondents.

Before STOKER, DOUCET and KNOLL, JJ.


WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in denying relator's request for a jury trial. La. Code Civ.Proc. art. 1732(6) only affects suits that have been filed after the amendment's effective date. Cambridge Corner Corp. v. Menard, 525 So.2d 527 (La. 1988); Marks v. Petroleum Helicopters, Inc., an unreported decision bearing Number W89-447 on the Docket of the Court rendered on May 1, 1989. Since C.C.P. art. 1732(6) was not effective until September 7, 1988 and since this suit was filed on May 21, 1986, relator is entitled to a jury trial.

IT IS ORDERED that the trial court's judgment striking relator's prayer for a jury trial be and the same is hereby reversed.


Summaries of

Pope v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Jun 23, 1989
548 So. 2d 37 (La. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Pope v. Penrod Drilling Co.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN N. POPE, ET UX. v. PENROD DRILLING COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 23, 1989

Citations

548 So. 2d 37 (La. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Bergeron v. Main Iron Works, Inc.

This amendment was not applicable to this case because the suit was filed before the effective date of the…