Opinion
2:23-CV-00294-JLR JLR
03-30-2023
ASHLEY POPA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFF, v. PSP GROUP, LLC D/B/A PET SUPPLIES PLUS, AND MICROSOFT CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.
Nicola C. Menaldo, Bar No. 44459 Anna M. Thompson, Bar No. 52418 PERKINS COIE LLP, James G. Snell (pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP Counsel for Defendant Microsoft Corporation James G. Snell (pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP Counsel for Defendant Microsoft Corporation Kim D Stephens TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC Gary F Lynch (pro hac vice) Nicholas Colella LYNCH CARPENTER LLP Counsel for Plaintiff Ashley Popa John S Devlin, III LANE POWELL PC, James L. Rockney (pro hac vice) Gerard M. Stegmaier (pro hac vice) REED SMITH Counsel for Defendant PSP Group, LLC
NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR: MARCH 29, 2023
Nicola C. Menaldo, Bar No. 44459 Anna M. Thompson, Bar No. 52418 PERKINS COIE LLP, James G. Snell (pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP Counsel for Defendant Microsoft Corporation
James G. Snell (pro hac vice) PERKINS COIE LLP Counsel for Defendant Microsoft Corporation
Kim D Stephens TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC Gary F Lynch (pro hac vice) Nicholas Colella LYNCH CARPENTER LLP Counsel for Plaintiff Ashley Popa
John S Devlin, III LANE POWELL PC, James L. Rockney (pro hac vice) Gerard M. Stegmaier (pro hac vice) REED SMITH Counsel for Defendant PSP Group, LLC
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND OR CLARIFY DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JAMES L. ROBART, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Ashley Popa, and Defendants PSP Group, LLC and Microsoft Corporation (collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby move to extend or clarify the deadline for Defendants to respond to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) to June 6, 2023.
The Parties have conferred and agree that the proposed extension or clarification is necessary and in the best interests of all Parties for the reasons described below:
1. The Honorable J. Nicholas Ranjan recently transferred the above-captioned case from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to this Court. See Dkt. 34. Prior to the transfer, Judge Ranjan ordered that Defendants' responses to the FAC would be due within 21 days of the resolution of Microsoft's Motion to Transfer. ECF No. 30. That deadline would have been March 20, 2023.
2. On February 27, 2023, Judge Ranjan granted Microsoft's Motion to Transfer. See Dkt. 33. Thus, this action is no longer before Judge Ranjan.
3. Following the transfer of this action, the Parties agreed to negotiate a briefing schedule for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's amended complaint through a joint stipulation to the Court.
4. Extending the deadline to June 6, 2023, will serve judicial economy because it coincides with the deadline for defendants to respond to the consolidated complaint in In re Zillow.
5. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and respectfully move the Court to enter an order setting the deadline for Defendants to respond to the FAC for June 6, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.