From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pop Top Corp. v. Nook Dig.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 2022
20-CV-6598 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)

Opinion

20-CV-6598 (VSB)

05-17-2022

POP TOP CORP., Plaintiff, v. NOOK DIGITAL, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 18, 2022, I granted the parties' joint letter motion requesting a briefing schedule to resolve what they described as “the threshold issue of the priority date of the remaining patent-in-suit ....” (Doc. 39.) The parties indicating that Defendant believed that determining the priority date could “potentially dispose of the remaining issues in this case.” (See id. at 1.) The parties requested that Plaintiff would file a moving brief to establish a particular priority date and that Defendant would thereafter file an opposition brief. (Id at 1-2.) The parties subsequently filed their briefs, as well as supporting documents. (See Docs. 40-44.)

When a district court resolves a disagreement about the priority date to which a patent is entitled, it often does so as part of a motion for summary judgment. See, e.g., Lockwood v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 107 F.3d 1565, 1567, 1571 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (analyzing appeal from order granting summary judgment to defendant based on a priority date ruling); Chizmar v. ACCO Brands Corp., No. 14-cv-2181 (PKC), 2015 WL 2408818, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 8, 2015), aff'd, 636 Fed.Appx. 803 (Fed. Cir. 2016); Carotek, Inc. v. Kobayashi Ventures, LLC, 875 F.Supp.2d 313, 334-36 (S.D.N.Y. 2012). Although I believe that the parties have presented sufficient materials for me to resolve the priority date issue in this case, I wish to ensure that the parties agree with me that they have been afforded sufficient process. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that by May 19, 2022, the parties shall file a joint letter informing me as to whether they would object to my construing their briefings as raising issues to be resolved under the summary judgment standard, as well as whether either party believes it should be allowed to file further materials, including Rule 56.1 statements, before I resolve the priority date issue raised by their papers.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Pop Top Corp. v. Nook Dig.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 17, 2022
20-CV-6598 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Pop Top Corp. v. Nook Dig.

Case Details

Full title:POP TOP CORP., Plaintiff, v. NOOK DIGITAL, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 17, 2022

Citations

20-CV-6598 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 17, 2022)