From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Poole v. CDCR Sec'y

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
20-cv-02283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-02283-HSG

01-25-2023

ANDRE T. POOLE, Plaintiff, v. CDCR SECRETARY, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

RE: DKT. NO. 1

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge

Petitioner has filed this action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state court conviction from Alameda County Superior Court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243 and Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Respondent is ordered to show cause why the writ should not be granted. The Clerk shall serve electronically a copy of this order and the operative petition and the exhibits thereto upon the Respondent and the Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California, at the following email address: SFAWTParalegals@doj.ca.gov.

Within ninety-one (91) days of the issuance of this order, Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner an answer conforming in all respects to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the petition. If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty-five (35) days of the date the answer is filed.

In the alternative, Respondent may file, within ninety-one (91) days of the issuance of this order, a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty-five (35) days of the date the motion is filed, and Respondent shall file with the Court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fourteen (14) days of the date any opposition is filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Poole v. CDCR Sec'y

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
20-cv-02283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Poole v. CDCR Sec'y

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE T. POOLE, Plaintiff, v. CDCR SECRETARY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

20-cv-02283-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)