From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ponzi v. Suntrust

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 2, 2009
4 So. 3d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 4D08-1038.

January 14, 2009. Rehearing Denied April 2, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Ben L. Bryan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-2607 CA.

Dominic Ponzi, Jensen Beach, pro se.

Thomas M. Moon of Spear and Hoffman, P.A., Miami, for appellee Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.


Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a), we summarily affirm the order appealed in this case. Appellant has appealed only an order directing the Clerk of Court to issue a certificate of title. In his initial brief, appellant has proffered no ground in law for reversal. His reason for requesting vacation of the order involves the difficulty in which loss of this property will put his entire family. Although all may be sympathetic to the appellant's problems, this is not a ground for denying a certificate of title to the successful bidder in a foreclosure action. As to the remaining issues raised in his brief, these refer to the final judgment of foreclosure or other orders, none of which were appealed, and any challenge to them is now untimely.

GROSS, C.J., WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ponzi v. Suntrust

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 2, 2009
4 So. 3d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Ponzi v. Suntrust

Case Details

Full title:Dominic PONZI, Appellant, v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., et al., Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 2, 2009

Citations

4 So. 3d 3 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)