holding that "[w]hether or not Plaintiff's complaint of judicial misconduct would result in any disciplinary action against another is not sufficient injury to create standing. . . . Consequently, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's Complaint does not allege a cognizable injury to create standing"
Summary of this case from Bracci v. BeckerCivil No. 10-2213 (JBS).
March 22, 2011
DONNELL PONTON, Plaintiff Pro Se, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
holding that "[w]hether or not Plaintiff's complaint of judicial misconduct would result in any disciplinary action against another is not sufficient injury to create standing. . . . Consequently, the Court concludes that Plaintiff's Complaint does not allege a cognizable injury to create standing"
Summary of this case from Bracci v. BeckerFull title:DONNELL PONTON, Plaintiff, v. U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, et al., Defendants
Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Date published: Mar 22, 2011
Section 351 provides a complainant a forum to file a complaint of judicial misconduct, but it does not…
Hueter v. KruseRather, it provides a procedure by which persons "may file with the clerk of the court of appeals for the…