From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ponton v. McCullough

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 19, 2006
Civil Action No. 02-138J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 02-138J.

September 19, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

On August 25, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, docket no. 42, recommending that the defendants' motion for summary judgment, docket no. 24, be denied.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of September, 2006, it is

ORDERED that, defendants' motion for summary judgment, docket no. 24, is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Ponton v. McCullough

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 19, 2006
Civil Action No. 02-138J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2006)
Case details for

Ponton v. McCullough

Case Details

Full title:TROY PONTON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT JOHN McCULLOUGH, S.C.I…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 19, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 02-138J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 19, 2006)