Opinion
February 27, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.).
Plaintiff's corporate general ledger is relevant, and the order that plaintiff disclose it was a proper exercise of discretion. Plaintiff's counsel candidly stated that plaintiff was refusing to produce the ledger because it had unilaterally determined that it was immaterial. There was, therefore, willful non-compliance with a prior court order directing disclosure, justifying the sanction of dismissal ( see, Zletz v. Wetanson, 67 N.Y.2d 711). Given this background, there was no "good cause shown" (CPLR 6513) to warrant extending plaintiff's notice of pendency.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.